September 11 and the origins of the "War on Terrorism":
A revisionist account
by Stephen J. Sniegoski, continued.
Part two
Foreknowledge
How did it happen that the September 11 tragedy led to developments long sought by Big Oil and by Israel? Were the terrorist attacks really a bolt from the blue truly fortuitous a case of pure serendipity? Or is there any evidence that the U.S. government and Israel had prior knowledge of the impending terrorist strikes but allowed them to take place or perhaps even facilitated them?
Even operatives of the Establishment media recognize the improbability of September 11's coming as a complete surprise. As Howard Kurtz wrote in the Washington Post: "How could we not have known? How is it that America was totally blindsided by the Sept. 11 attacks?" [15]
As Bill Clinton might put it, it all depends on what "we" means. In fact, considerable evidence has come to light suggesting that certain Americans, and others, were not blindsided at all.
Instant messages to Israel
Employees in the Israel office of the instant-messaging firm Odigo received messages from the company's New York office warning of the terrorist aerial strikes about two hours before they occurred. Originally it was stated that the World Trade Center was specifically mentioned, but that was later denied. [16]
Stock-market speculation
Just prior to September 11, sudden and unexplained speculation occurred in the stock of American and United airlines. An inordinate number of "put" options bets that a stock will go down were placed on those two listings. No other airlines saw such speculation. Similar "put" options were placed on the stock of various companies including Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley that were housed in the World Trade Towers. Since it is common for stocks of companies that suffer tragedies to plunge, this stock speculation would imply that someone had foreknowledge of the horrific event. American intelligence should have been aware of the abnormal speculation, since the CIA and other intelligence agencies monitor stock trading closely. [17]
It is interesting that many of the "put" options on United Airlines were purchased through Deutschebank/AB Brown, a firm managed until 1998 by the current executive director of the CIA, A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard. [18]
Private warnings
Some people outside the intelligence organs seem also to have gotten warnings. For
example, San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown was scheduled to fly to New York City on
the morning of September 11, but he claimed later that he received a call the night
before from his "security people at the airport" telling him that he should be
extra-cautious about air travel on the eleventh. [19] The FAA prevented the author Salman Rushdie, who
is under special protection because of threats on his life, from flying to the United
States during the week leading up to September 11, and Rushdie connects that prohibition
to terror warnings in the possession of the government.
[20] In August 2001, Drs. Garth
and Mary Nicolson, a husband-and-wife medical team who are among the foremost
Gulf War Syndrome investigators, reported to Department of Defense and National
Security Council officials that a number of personal friends in the intelligence and
diplomatic communities had told them that a terrorist attack on the Pentagon would
take place on September 11. [21]
And CounterPunch, the newsletter edited by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair,
reported that the extremely influential and well-connected investment firm Goldman
Sachs circulated an internal memo in its Tokyo office on September 10 advising all
employees to avoid any U.S. government buildings because of a possible terrorist
attack. [22]
It is highly significant that knowledge of the planned aerial onslaught seems to have
leaked outside the terrorist network, for if outsiders knew about the planned attack,
one would not expect the CIA itself to be excluded from that knowledge. Bin Laden and his
associates had been funded and trained by the CIA in the war against the Soviet Union.
It is hard to fathom how the CIA, the best-financed intelligence organization in the
world, would be unable to secure information on an organization made up of its
former employees.
Public warnings
The fact of the matter is that it was public knowledge that Osama Bin Laden was
planning terrorist acts in the United States. On June 23, 2001, Reuters dispatched a
story headlined "Bin Laden Fighters Plan Anti-U.S. attack," with this lead sentence:
"Followers of exiled Saudi dissident Osama Bin Laden are planning a major attack on
U.S. and Israeli interests." And a June 25 UPI dispatch stated: "Saudi dissident Osama
Bin Laden is planning a terrorist attack against the United States." [23]
Warnings to the U.S. government
Dire warnings flowed to the U.S. government from various sources. Egyptian
President Hosni Mubarak claims to have warned the United States 12 days prior to
September 11 that "something would happen." [24] According to Russian news reports, Russian intelligence
notified the CIA during the summer that 25 terrorist pilots had been specifically
training for suicide missions. In an interview September 15 with MSNBC, Russian
President Vladimir Putin confirmed that in August he had ordered Russian intelligence
to warn the United States "in the strongest possible terms" of imminent terrorist
strikes on airports and government buildings. [25] According to a story in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies received warning signals in the early summer
that Middle Eastern terrorists were planning to hijack commercial aircraft and use
them as weapons to destroy important symbols of American and Israeli culture.
[26] German police have
confirmed that an Iranian man phoned the U.S. Secret Service from his deportation
cell in Germany to warn of the planned terrorist assault on the World Trade Center.
[27]
U.S. was aware of hijacked-planes scenario
A key aspect of the official story is that while U.S. authorities did expect acts of
terrorism in the United States, the hijacked-planes scenario was completely
unforeseen. The truth is, however, that terrorist use of hijacked planes had been talked
about for some time. As columnist Robert Novak pointed out in his column of
September 27: "From the moment of the September 11th attacks, high-ranking federal
officials insisted that the terrorists' method of operation surprised them. Many stick to
that story. Actually, elements of the hijacking plan were known to the FBI as early as
1995 and, if coupled with current information, might have uncovered the plot."
[28]
In January 1995, police in the Philippines arrested Abdul Hakim Murad, an associate of
Ramzi Yousef, leader of the group involved in the 1993 World Trade Towers bombing.
Under interrogation, Murad spoke of a plan by the Ramzi group to hijack a
commercial airliner and crash it into CIA headquarters in Virginia. Murad, who had
attended flight schools in the United States, said that he was going to be the pilot.
Filipino investigators also turned up evidence that commercial buildings in San
Francisco, Chicago, and New York City were to be targeted. That information was
passed on to the FBI. [29]
Notably, U.S. security officials had considered and prepared for possible attacks by
suicide planes during the Atlanta Summer Olympics in 1996. [30] Furthermore, measures to
avert suicide airliner crashes were in effect during the 2000 Olympics in Sydney and
were on track for the 2002 winter games in Salt Lake City. As a matter of fact,
International Olympic Committee officials have revealed that suicide plane-crash
scenarios had been considered in their security planning for every Olympics since
1972. [31] In addition, the
FAA's Criminal Acts against Civil Aviation report for 2000 warned that Bin Laden and
his followers were a threat to U.S. civil aviation. [32] Finally, since 1996 the FBI had made numerous inquiries
about suspected Bin Laden associates' taking flight training in the United States and
abroad. [33]
U.S. monitored Bin Laden's conversations
U.S. authorities acknowledge that they electronically monitored Bin Laden's
conversations in the past, but the official story maintains that Bin Laden stopped
engaging in electronic communication after he learned that monitored
communications had aided the U.S. cruise missile strike on his Afghanistan training
camp in 1998. However, some knowledgeable observers reject that account. For
example, the eminent Egyptian journalist and former government spokesman
Mohammed Heikal, in an interview with the British newspaper The Guardian,
maintained that "Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every telephone call
was monitored and al Qaeda has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani
intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept secret
an operation that required such a degree of organisation and sophistication." [34]
Moreover, in February, 2001, UPI terrorism correspondent Richard Sale reported that
U.S. intelligence agencies were able to monitor some of Bin Laden's electronic
communications. [35] If, as the
official story has it, the September 11 events required long-term planning, it would
seem likely that American intelligence picked up some information about
the plan.
Official claims of an intelligence blackout in the run-up to September 11 seem odd in
light of other official claims that U.S. intelligence was able to successfully monitor the Bin
Laden network's electronic communications immediately after the attacks.
According to Newsweek magazine, the key reason that the authorities identified Bin
Laden as the culprit was that U.S. intelligence picked up communications among his
associates relaying the message: "We've hit the targets." [36]
Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah gave a similar account to the Associated Press on
September 11, claiming that U.S. government monitors had overheard two Bin Laden
aides celebrating the successful terrorist strike. [37] Hatch repeated the story to ABC News the same day, adding
that he had received the information from both CIA and FBI officials. The validity of
Hatch's story was confirmed by the hostile reaction of Bush administration officials,
with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld condemning the unauthorized disclosure of
allegedly classified information. [38]
It's hard to deny that Bin Laden would have to rely heavily upon electronic
communications in order to direct a global terrorist operation. And if U.S. intelligence
agencies were able to monitor his communications immediately after the September 11
attack, it is difficult to believe that they were totally unable to do so before that
time.
Hijackers were known to authorities
Interestingly, the suicide hijackers were actually known to U.S. authorities, and they
seem to have made little effort to conceal their identities. For example, the FBI placed
two of the hijackers, Kahlil Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhamzi, on an FBI "watch list" on
August 23, after the CIA received information linking the pair to Bin Laden. But the
authorities somehow failed to pass along that information to the airlines, and the two
were able to buy first-class one-way airline tickets, and then board and hijack a jetliner
on September 11. [39]
The case of Ziad Samir Jarrah, one of the suspected hijackers aboard the United
Airlines jet that crashed in Pennsylvania, has its oddities also. Authorities in the United
Arab Emirates detained and questioned Jarrah at the Dubai International Airport after
he arrived there from Pakistan on January 30, 2001. The request for the interrogation
had been made by the U.S. government. According to an unnamed United Arab
Emirates official: "The Americans told us that he was a supporter of terrorist
organizations, that he had connections with terrorist organizations."
Jarrah was allowed to leave the U.A.E., traveling on to Hamburg via Amsterdam.
Later he flew to the United States. Despite the interest of U.S. authorities in him and
his activities and his connections, Jarrah was allowed to enter the country. He then
enrolled in a flight school.
Jarrah was stopped for speeding in Maryland on September 9, two days before the
hijacking. The Maryland State Police apparently ran his name through their computers
but, inexplicably enough, found nothing on him. They issued him a ticket and allowed
him to proceed. [40]
The strange case of Mohammed Atta
Mohammed Atta, the alleged ringleader of the terrorist strike team, was reportedly an
object of attention for Egyptian, German, and American authorities, and yet managed to
travel without hindrance between Europe and America throughout 2000 and 2001. U.S.
agents in Germany had monitored Atta's group there before September 11; after the attacks, according to the British paper The Observer, "A team of agents dispatched by the FBI to Germany has been focusing on the northern city of Hamburg, where three of the men who died in the planes and four others who were on the FBI's initial list of suspects studied at universities." Atta "was under surveillance between January and May last year [2000] after he was reportedly observed buying large quantities of chemicals in Frankfurt, apparently for
the production of explosives and for biological warfare." [41]
Atta came to the attention of U.S. authorities several times in 2001. On January 10,
2001, he was allowed to enter the United States on a tourist visa, even though he
admitted to immigration officials that he would be attending flight school, an activity
that requires a student visa. The executive director of the American
Immigration Lawyers Association told the Washington Post that "nine times out of ten"
a person in that situation would have been denied entrance. Oddly enough, federal
immigration police overlooked Atta's visa status violation even though he had
previously been under FBI surveillance for stockpiling bomb-making materials. [42]
During the summer of 2001, the FBI discovered that Atta received a wire transfer of
$100,000 from an account in Pakistan alleged to be controlled by a representative of
Osama Bin Laden. [43] It is
difficult to understand how such a large sum of money could be transmitted with
impunity to someone under FBI surveillance.
The strange case of Zacarias Moussaoui
The government's seeming lack of interest in the case of Zacarias Moussaoui is also
very strange. On January 3, 2002, Moussaoui was arraigned on terrorism conspiracy
charges in connection with the September 11 attacks. He had been arrested in
Minnesota on August 16 after officials of a flight school there alerted the FBI of his
suspicious behavior. Though lacking the most basic flying skills, he was seeking flight
training on a commercial jet simulator. Moreover, he reportedly did not want to learn
how to take off or land, only how to steer the jet while it was in the air. Moussaoui
was detained by the Immigration and Naturalization Service on charges of violating
the terms of his visa.
Local FBI investigators in Minneapolis immediately viewed Moussaoui as a terrorist
suspect and sought authorization for a special counterintelligence surveillance
warrant in order to search the hard drive of his home computer. Higher-level officials
in Washington rejected the request, claiming there was insufficient evidence to meet
the legal requirements for the warrant. On August 26, French intelligence notified FBI
headquarters that Moussaoui had connections to Osama Bin Laden, but even that
revelation had little effect. A special counterterrorism panel of the FBI and CIA
concluded that there was insufficient evidence to show that Moussaoui represented
any threat, and he was not even transferred from INS detention to FBI custody until
after September 11. [44] In an
analysis published December 22, the New York Times commented that the Moussaoui
case "raised new questions about why the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other
agencies did not prevent the hijackings." [45]
What did the U.S. government know?
In early August, the CIA informed the White House and other high government
officials that Osama Bin Laden intended to mount a terrorist attack in the United
States. [46] In its September 24
issue, Newsweek made the startling revelation that on September 10, "A group of top
Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently
because of security concerns." [47] That would imply that some federal officials knew of the
exact timing of the attack. It appears that while federal officials might have made use
of such knowledge to save their own skins, they had no desire to actually prevent the
terrorist attack from taking place; or, to be more precise, that certain government
officials at the highest levels had no desire to prevent it from taking place.
David P. Schippers, noted Chicago lawyer and the House Judiciary Committee's chief
investigator in the Clinton impeachment trial, has charged that elements of the U.S.
government had foreknowledge of the September attack. He claims that
lower-echelon FBI agents in Chicago and Minnesota contacted him about a month and
a half before September 11 and told him that a terrorist attack was going to occur in
lower Manhattan.
According to Schippers, the agents had been developing extensive information on the
planned attack for many months. However, the FBI command pulled them off the
terrorist investigation and threatened them with prosecution under the National
Security Act if they went public with the information. As a result, some of them went to
Schippers in hopes of prompting someone influential to persuade the government to
take action. Schippers tried to pass the information on to high government officials
including some in the attorney general's office but his efforts
apparently were ignored. One would have thought that Schippers's background would have made him a credible witness, especially in the eyes of the intelligence and security appointees of a Republican regime.
He is now representing at least ten of the FBI agents in a suit against
the U.S. government in an attempt to have their testimony subpoenaed, which would
enable them to legally tell what they know and legally get it on record. [48]
Alleged terrorists acted like boobs
In an interview that appeared on January 13 in the Berlin daily Tagesspiegel,
Andreas von Bülow who served on a parliamentary commission that
oversaw the three branches of German intelligence from 1969 to 1994 finds
the modus operandi of the alleged terrorist highjackers to be very suspicious. In
particular, he regards the clues that they left behind to be very amateurish, if not
idiotic. He describes them as
How could terrorists who were capable of secretly carrying out a very complicated
plan, undetected beforehand, leave evidence behind that even the Keystone Cops could
detect? Or was the evidence left behind for the express purpose of incriminating the
Bin Laden network?
Reporter Robert Fisk points out that the alleged evidence does not mesh with the
notion that the terrorist highjackers were devoted Muslims. Fisk writes: "If the
handwritten, five-page document which the FBI says it found in the baggage of
Mohamed Atta, the suicide bomber from Egypt, is genuine, then the men who
murdered more than 7,000 innocent people believed in a very exclusive version of Islam
or were surprisingly unfamiliar with their religion." [50]
Other strange revelations
Two other pieces of evidence frequently cited by conspiratorial believers are most
intriguing but are of uncertain validity. One odd case is that of a 35-year-old American
by the name of Delmart Edward "Mike" Vreeland II. Vreeland claims to be a lieutenant
in a U.S. Navy intelligence unit and says he knew in advance about the September 11
attacks. He has been imprisoned in Canada since December 2000, being initially
arrested on fraud-related charges. While in prison, he tried to warn Canadian
authorities about possible terrorist attacks on New York and the Pentagon, as well as
on targets in Ottawa and Toronto, but was ignored. He then wrote the warning on a
piece of paper, sealed it in an envelope, and handed it to jail guards a month before the
attacks. The guards opened the letter on September 14 and immediately forwarded the
information to Ottawa.
American law-enforcement officials want Vreeland returned to the United States,
where he would face fraud-related criminal charges in five states. Vreeland and his
lawyers are fighting extradition, claiming that a return to this country could mean his
death. [51] The entire story is
fascinating, but Vreeland does appear to be a con artist. [52] That he was in naval
intelligence and was involved in various secret operations seems implausible. His
prediction of the attacks could have been a lucky guess.
More intriguing are remarks that Tom Kennedy, a member of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's (FEMA) National Urban Search and Rescue Team, made
during a nationally telecast interview with CBS News anchor Dan Rather on
September 13. Kennedy told Rather that FEMA sent the Urban Search and Rescue
Team to New York City on Monday night, which was the night before the attacks
occurred!
Kennedy recounted: "We're currently one of the first teams that was deployed to
support the City of New York in this disaster. We arrived on late Monday night
[September 10] and went right into action on Tuesday morning" [September 11].
FEMA officials said Kennedy misstated his team's arrival date. Kennedy has never
been reached for comment. The easy explanation is that this was a slip of the tongue,
but since the interview took place on September 13, it would seem that
Kennedy must have fallen victim to an extremely poor memory perhaps
signaling early-onset Alzheimer's Syndrome. [53]
Bush administration hindered Bin Laden probes
FBI and military intelligence officials in Washington have claimed that they were
prevented for political reasons from carrying out full investigations into members of
the Bin Laden family and Saudi activities in the United States before the attacks of
September 11. [54] FBI deputy
director John O'Neill, who for years led U.S. investigations into Bin Laden's al Qaeda
network, resigned in August 2001 in protest over the obstruction. [55]
Ironically, after his resignation O'Neill took a new job as head of security at the World Trade Center. He died on September 11.
March 14, 2002
To part three.
If you found this article to be interesting, please donate to our cause. You should make your check or m.o. payable in U.S. dollars to WTM
Enterprises and send it to:
Thanks for helping to assure a future for TLD! Notice to visitors who came
straight to this document from off site: You are deep in The Last Ditch. You
should check out our home page and table
of contents. assailants who ... leave tracks behind them like a herd of stampeding
elephants[.] They made payments with credit cards with their own names; they
reported to their flight instructors with their own names. They left behind rented cars
with flight manuals in Arabic for jumbo jets. They took with them, on their suicide trip,
wills and farewell letters, which fell into the hands of the FBI, because they were
stored in the wrong place and wrongly addressed. Clues were left like behind like in a
child's game of hide-and-seek, which were to be followed. [49]
WTM Enterprises
P.O. Box 224
Roanoke, IN 46783